Herrick v. Richardson
This text of 11 Mass. 234 (Herrick v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The return of the officer is not non est inventus; nor sufficient to charge the bail. Let the plaintiff be called,
Plaintiff nonsuit.
[219]*219CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, IN THE COUNTY OF LINCOLN, JUNE TERM, 1814, AT WISCASSET. PRESENT: Hon. SAMUEL SEW ALL, Chief Justice. Hon. GEORGE THATCHER,) Hon. ISAAC PARKER, > Justices Hon. DANIEL DEWEY, )
Vide Sayward & Al. vs. Conant, ante, 146, and note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Mass. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrick-v-richardson-mass-1814.