Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
21 N.W. 471, 32 Minn. 435, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 191
Opinion
There is nothing in the point that the cause of action was in part assigned to Lovely & Morgan. The. other points raised are identical with those decided by this court on the former appeal, (see 31 Minn. 11,) and we adhere to that decision.
•Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co., 21 N.W. 471, 32 Minn. 435, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 191 (Mich. 1884).
21 N.W. 471 (Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.
92 P. 469 (Montana Supreme Court, 1907)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Montgomery
49 N.E. 582 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1898)