Herrick v. Lynch

37 N.E. 221, 150 Ill. 283
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedMay 8, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 37 N.E. 221 (Herrick v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herrick v. Lynch, 37 N.E. 221, 150 Ill. 283 (Ill. 1894).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Counsel on both sides have filed in this court the same briefs prepared by them for and used in the Appellate Court, and no proposition is raised here which was not presented to and passed upon by that court. All the controverted questions raised are essentially questions of fact, and as to most of them the evidence is to a great extent conflicting. We have examined the record with care, and are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree. The opinion of the Appellate Court, as it seems to us, fairly and properly disposes of the points made by counsel, and any further discussion of them by us would therefore be superfluous. We are disposed to adopt the opinion of that court, and for the reasons there stated, the judgment affirming the decree will’ be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mills v. Susanka
64 N.E.2d 216 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1945)
Lane v. Gugsell
47 N.E.2d 835 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1943)
Ford v. Caspers
128 F.2d 884 (Seventh Circuit, 1942)
Prickett v. Prickett
39 N.E.2d 984 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1942)
Sontag v. Denio
73 P.2d 248 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
State ex rel. Squire v. Central United National Bank
20 Ohio Law. Abs. 238 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)
Bane v. Bane
246 Ill. App. 229 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
Kapalos v. Ganas
242 Ill. App. 302 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1926)
Shannon v. Lunsford
111 So. 22 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Morgan Clark v. Millsap
242 P. 918 (California Supreme Court, 1926)
Duncan v. Dazey
214 Ill. App. 241 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1919)
Lang v. Lang
284 Ill. 148 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1918)
Gilchrist v. Hatch
106 N.E. 694 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1914)
Soden v. Claney
185 Ill. App. 596 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
Auxer v. Llewellyn
142 Ill. App. 265 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)
Phillips v. Bradford
41 So. 657 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Gleason & Bailey Manufacturing Co. v. Hoffman
48 N.E. 143 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1897)
Gleason & Bailey Manufacturing Co. v. Hoffman
63 Ill. App. 294 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 N.E. 221, 150 Ill. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrick-v-lynch-ill-1894.