Herrick v. Dakchoylous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herrick v. Dakchoylous

274 A.D. 911

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 1948·Published

Opinion

Order modified by eliminating from the decretal provisions of the order paragraph “ 2 ” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents upon the ground that petitioners are not aggrieved parties. Permission is hereby granted to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur. [193 Misc. 6.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by eliminating from the decretal provisions of the order paragraph “ 2 ” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents upon the ground that petitioners are not aggrieved parties. Permission is hereby granted to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur. [193 Misc. 6.]

Herrick v. Dakchoylous, 274 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

274 A.D. 911 (Herrick v. Dakchoylous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related