Herrick v. Cutcheon

First Circuit

Herrick v. Cutcheon

55 F. 6, 5 C.C.A. 21, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1514

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 3, 1893·No. No. 48·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Whatever may he the practice of the circuit court as to drawing out decrees before they become effective as such, it is plain that the docket entry in this case, containing only the words, “Opinion — Decree for complainants,” does not constitute a decree for an injunction required to give this court jurisdiction, nor can the docket entry he aided for that purpose by reference to the opinion. The appeal was taken prematurely, and is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

Whatever may he the practice of the circuit court as to drawing out decrees before they become effective as such, it is plain that the docket entry in this case, containing only the words, “Opinion — Decree for complainants,” does not constitute a decree for an injunction required to give this court jurisdiction, nor can the docket entry he aided for that purpose by reference to the opinion. The appeal was taken prematurely, and is dismissed.

Herrick v. Cutcheon, 55 F. 6, 5 C.C.A. 21, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1514 (1st Cir. 1893).

Pincite

55 F. 6 (Herrick v. Cutcheon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related