Herrick v. Cutcheon

First Circuit

Herrick v. Cutcheon

55 F. 6, 5 C.C.A. 21, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1514

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1893

DocketNo. 48

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 55 F. 6 (Herrick v. Cutcheon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrick v. Cutcheon, 55 F. 6, 5 C.C.A. 21, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1514 (1st Cir. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Whatever may he the practice of the circuit court as to drawing out decrees before they become effective as such, it is plain that the docket entry in this case, containing only the words, “Opinion — Decree for complainants,” does not constitute a decree for an injunction required to give this court jurisdiction, nor can the docket entry he aided for that purpose by reference to the opinion. The appeal was taken prematurely, and is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

Whatever may he the practice of the circuit court as to drawing out decrees before they become effective as such, it is plain that the docket entry in this case, containing only the words, “Opinion — Decree for complainants,” does not constitute a decree for an injunction required to give this court jurisdiction, nor can the docket entry he aided for that purpose by reference to the opinion. The appeal was taken prematurely, and is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F. 6, 5 C.C.A. 21, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrick-v-cutcheon-ca1-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack