Herrick v. Bunting

29 Ind. 467
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The errors assigned in this case relate exclusively to matters properly presented as causes for a' new [468]*468trial. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled, but that ruling is not assigned as error. The questions discussed by the appellant's counsel are therefore not properly befoz’e us, and hence we cannot pass upon them.

J. E. McDonald, A. L. Doache, T. J. Merrijiéld and W. ID Galkins, for appellant. S. I. Anthony, F. Church, S. E. Perkins, D. Jordan and S. E. Perkins, jr., for appellee.

The judgment is affizuned, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrick v. Bunting, 29 Ind. 467 (Ind. 1868).

29 Ind. 467 (Herrick v. Bunting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Temple v. Lasher
39 Ind. 203 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Cole v. Burris
38 Ind. 168 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Tyner v. Adams
34 Ind. 401 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1870)