Herrick v. Bunting

Indiana Supreme Court

Herrick v. Bunting

29 Ind. 467

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1868

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 Ind. 467 (Herrick v. Bunting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrick v. Bunting, 29 Ind. 467 (Ind. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The errors assigned in this case relate exclusively to matters properly presented as causes for a' new [468]*468trial. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled, but that ruling is not assigned as error. The questions discussed by the appellant's counsel are therefore not properly befoz’e us, and hence we cannot pass upon them.

J. E. McDonald, A. L. Doache, T. J. Merrijiéld and W. ID Galkins, for appellant. S. I. Anthony, F. Church, S. E. Perkins, D. Jordan and S. E. Perkins, jr., for appellee.

The judgment is affizuned, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

The errors assigned in this case relate exclusively to matters properly presented as causes for a' new [468]*468trial. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled, but that ruling is not assigned as error. The questions discussed by the appellant's counsel are therefore not properly befoz’e us, and hence we cannot pass upon them.

J. E. McDonald, A. L. Doache, T. J. Merrijiéld and W. ID Galkins, for appellant. S. I. Anthony, F. Church, S. E. Perkins, D. Jordan and S. E. Perkins, jr., for appellee.

The judgment is affizuned, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ind. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrick-v-bunting-ind-1868.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack