Herrick v. Bennett
8 Johns. 374
Opinion
It is to be presumed that the plaintiff has stated the note, in his declaration," according to the terms of it, and that is sufficient. The conclusion of the law is, that where no time of payment is specified in a [375]*375note, it is payable immediately. The first count, then, ** . ' . shows a cause of action, and the plaintiff is entitled to Judgment.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herrick v. Bennett, 8 Johns. 374 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
8 Johns. 374 (Herrick v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbs v. Blanchard
15 Mich. 292 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1867)
White v. Tarbell
27 Vt. 573 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1855)
Okie v. Spencer
2 Whart. 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1837)