Herrfurth v. Board of Education of Pearl River School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herrfurth v. Board of Education of Pearl River School District

46 A.D.2d 688, 361 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3813

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 688 (Herrfurth v. Board of Education of Pearl River School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrfurth v. Board of Education of Pearl River School District, 46 A.D.2d 688, 361 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondents’ determination terminating appellant’s employment, the appeals are (1) from an order-judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered November 28, 1973, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to CPLR 217 and (2) as limited by appellant’s brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated February 6, 1974, as, upon reargument, adhered to the-original decision. Order-judgment entered November 28, 1973 reversed and order dated February 6, 1974 reversed insofar as appealed from with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements, and respondents’ motion denied, upon the authority of Matter of Wimnger v. WilUamson (46 A D 2d 689). Respondents’ time to answer the petition is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondents’ determination terminating appellant’s employment, the appeals are (1) from an order-judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered November 28, 1973, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to CPLR 217 and (2) as limited by appellant’s brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated February 6, 1974, as, upon reargument, adhered to the-original decision. Order-judgment entered November 28, 1973 reversed and order dated February 6, 1974 reversed insofar as appealed from with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements, and respondents’ motion denied, upon the authority of Matter of Wimnger v. WilUamson (46 A D 2d 689). Respondents’ time to answer the petition is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 688, 361 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrfurth-v-board-of-education-of-pearl-river-school-district-nyappdiv-1974.