Herrera v. United States
This text of 583 F. App'x 820 (Herrera v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Cenobio Humberto Herrera, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order declaring him a vexatious litigant and imposing a pre-filing restriction against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, see Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp., 500 F.3d 1047, 1056 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by declaring Herrera a vexatious litigant and imposing a pre-filing restriction against him. The court gave Herrera notice and an opportunity to be heard, developed an adequate record for review, made findings regarding Herrera’s frivolous litigation history, and tailored the restriction narrowly. See id. at 1057-58 (discussing the four factors a district court must consider before imposing a pre-filing restriction on a vexatious litigant).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 F. App'x 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrera-v-united-states-ca9-2014.