Herrera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Herrera v. State

650 So. 2d 1032, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 625, 1995 WL 44564

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1995

DocketNo. 93-03462

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 650 So. 2d 1032 (Herrera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrera v. State, 650 So. 2d 1032, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 625, 1995 WL 44564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We reverse, however, the trial court’s assessments for costs of prosecution and the Hillsborough County court improvement fund. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the law of Sutton.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

FRANK, C.J., and THREADGILL and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We reverse, however, the trial court’s assessments for costs of prosecution and the Hillsborough County court improvement fund. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the law of Sutton.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

FRANK, C.J., and THREADGILL and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 So. 2d 1032, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 625, 1995 WL 44564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrera-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack