Herrera v. County of San Benito
Opinion
1 2 3 4 7 8 ROSARIO HERRERA, Case NO: 5:24-cv-01133 NC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 10 y DISMISSAL 11 Dkt. No. 99 Defendant. 13
15 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that
GQ 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this
5 17 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the
18 Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are 20 VACATED. 21 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 22 Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 24 25 Dated: October 1, 2025 h-_———— _ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 26 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herrera v. County of San Benito (Herrera v. County of San Benito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.