Herrera v. Berkley Regional Insurance Company

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided July 20, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00142·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO GERARDO HERRERA, Plaintiff, V. No. CV 20-142 CG/GBW BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. NOTICE OF CIVIL JURY TRIAL BY DIRECTION OF THE HON. CARMEN E. GARZA, CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, the case of Herrera v. Berkley Regional Insurance Company will come on for: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on Tuesday, December 21, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. at the United States Courthouse, 100 N. Church, Organ Courtroom, Las Cruces. JURY SELECTION and TRIAL on Monday, January 10, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., at the United States Courthouse, 100 N. Church, Organ Courtroom, Las Cruces.

CV 20-142 CG/GBW Herrera v. Berkley Regional Insurance Company (5 days) Attorneys for Plaintiff: Robert C. Trenchard, Jr. Royce E. Hoskins Sean Wang Attorneys for Defendants: Brian L. Shoemaker Ada B. Priest

Counsel and parties are to appear before Judge Garza one-half hour prior to jury selection to address any matters needing attention. For pretrial deadlines and other information, please refer to the attached pages. Please direct inquiries regarding this setting or other civil calendaring information to Katherine Erickson at eC Carmen E. Garza Chief United States Magistrate Judge

PREPARATION FOR TRIAL BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA

DECORUM AND GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. Be on time for each court session. Trial engagements take precedence over any other business. If you have matters in other courtrooms, make arrangements in advance for the handling of such matters. 2. Court time may not be used for marking exhibits. This must be done in advance of the court session. 3. Under no circumstances are you to attempt to communicate in any manner with any member of the jury prior to or during trial. Your clients and witnesses should also be so instructed. 4. Do not argue the case or discuss law in your opening statement. Your opening statement should present a concise summary of the ultimate facts to be proved. Do not describe in detail what particular witnesses will say. 5. You may move from the lectern when you question witnesses so long as it is not unduly distracting or uncomfortable for trial participants. 6. If you intend to question a witness about a group of documents, avoid delay by having all the documents with you when you start the examination. 7. Commence your examination or cross-examination without unnecessary preliminary introductions. 8. When you object in the presence of the jury, make your objection short and to the point. “Speaking” objections will not be allowed. Cite the Rule of Evidence or common designation for your objection (e.g., “hearsay”). Do not argue the objection. Do not make substantive motions (e.g., a motion for a mistrial or directed verdict) in the presence of the jury. Such matters may be raised at sidebar or, by request, at the first recess without waiving any rights by such delayed motion. 9. Do not argue with the ruling of the Court in the presence of the jury and refrain from thanking the Court following a ruling. 10. Each party will be responsible for securing the appearance of witnesses the party proposes to call. 11. Clients and witnesses are expected to be on time, and counsel should always have witnesses available to fill a full trial day (i.e., 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM). Counsel who does not have a witness available may be penalized. 12. Those exhibits which are not stipulated to shall be identified in sufficient detail to allow the Court to anticipate significant evidentiary problems. 13. Any exhibits not admitted at the beginning of trial may not be shown to the jury or testified to, regarding the contents of such exhibit, by the witness unless and until they are admitted. 14. Jury instructions shall be submitted to the Court in accordance with the section entitled PREPARATION OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS contained herein, along with Judge Garza’s stock jury instructions, which are available on Judge Garza’s Chambers Page at https://www.nmd.uscourts.gov/content/honorable-carmen-e- garza or by request. 15. Counsel will not get into possible areas of reversible error without prior Court approval, whether in opening or questioning witnesses. (E.g., Comment on a defendant’s silence, invocation of constitutional rights, Rules 404(b), 608 or 609 material, etc.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

GERARDO HERRERA,

Plaintiff,

v. No. CV 20-142 CG/GBW

BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL

After a telephonic Status Conference on June 21, 2021, to determine the appropriate dates for a jury trial and pretrial conferences in this case, the Court sets the following dates and deadlines: A Pretrial Conference will be held on December 21, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. in the Organ Courtroom at the United States Courthouse, 100 North Church Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico. All attorneys participating in the trial must be present for the pretrial conference. The parties may, but need not, be present. Jury Selection and Jury Trial will begin on January 10, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. in the Organ Courtroom at the United States Courthouse, 100 North Church Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico. Counsel are directed to submit a proposed consolidated final pretrial order as follows: Plaintiffs to Defendant on or before September 17, 2021; Defendant to Court on or before October 1, 2021. Counsel are directed that the pretrial order will provide that no witnesses except rebuttal witnesses, whose testimony cannot be anticipated, will be permitted to testify unless the name of the witness is furnished to the Court and opposing counsel no later than thirty (30) days prior to the time set for trial. Any exceptions thereto must be upon order of the Court for good cause shown. Motions in Limine: All motions in limine1 are due by November 29, 2021. Any responses or objections are due by December 6, 2021.

Witness Lists: The parties shall file their witness lists, which must disclose both witnesses that the parties “will call” and witnesses that they “may call” at trial. Witness lists are due by November 12, 2021. Any objections to a witness named by the opposing party must be filed by November 29, 2021. Designations and Counter-Designations of Deposition Testimony: The parties shall file designations, and counter-designations, of deposition testimony that they intend to use at trial. The designations and counter-designations must state the pages and lines of the deposition to be used. Plaintiffs will use a yellow marker and Defendants a blue marker. These requirements do not apply to cross-examination or rebuttal of a witness presented in person at trial. Designations must be filed by

December 6, 2021. Counsel must jointly submit one physical copy of each deposition to my chambers by this due date and must highlight the parts of the depositions that are to be used. Any objections to testimony designated by the opposing party, and any counter-designations, must be filed by December 13, 2021. If the parties wish to make further designations in light of the designations and counter-designations, leave for additional designations must be requested from the Court at the pretrial conference.

1 Motions challenging the admissibility of expert testimony under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) are not motions in limine. Daubert motions shall be filed no later than the dispositive motions deadline. Exhibits: The parties shall jointly file one list of stipulated exhibits and shall separately file lists of contested exhibits no later than November 12, 2021. They shall also submit two physical copies of marked exhibits to my chambers by the next business day. The first copy shall include exhibits that the parties stipulate to be

admissible, and shall be labeled consecutively.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrera v. Berkley Regional Insurance Company, (D.N.M. 2021).

Herrera v. Berkley Regional Insurance Company (Herrera v. Berkley Regional Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)