Herrera-Torres v. Garland
This text of Herrera-Torres v. Garland (Herrera-Torres v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-60532 Document: 00516735438 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 22-60532 May 2, 2023 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Eloisa Herrera-Torres,
Petitioner,
versus
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,
Respondent. ______________________________
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A075 786 650 ______________________________
Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Eloisa Herrera-Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reconsider its dismissal of her appeal of a decision of an immigra- tion judge that she was ineligible for cancellation of removal and ordering her removed.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-60532 Document: 00516735438 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2023
No. 22-60532
Herrera-Torres presents no contention concerning the reasons given by the BIA in its denial of her motion but instead raises a new argument chal- lenging the conclusion that her 2013 conviction disqualified her from cancel- lation of removal. Insofar as she challenges the denial of her motion to re- consider, Herrera-Torres has not shown that that ruling represents an abuse of the BIA’s discretion. See Gonzalez Hernandez v. Garland, 9 F.4th 278, 283 (5th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 86 (2022). Insofar as she presents a new argument for our consideration, we lack jurisdiction over it because it was not first presented to the BIA. See Martinez-Guevara v. Garland, 27 F.4th 353, 359–60 (5th Cir. 2022); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). The petition for review is DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herrera-Torres v. Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrera-torres-v-garland-ca5-2023.