Herrera Mendez v. Gonzales
This text of 146 F. App'x 937 (Herrera Mendez v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Herrera Mendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings to apply for cancellation relief as a battered spouse under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2)(A). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2). We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See De Martinez v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 759, 761 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that Herrera Mendez’s motion to reopen was not supported by previously unavailable evidence. 8 CFR § 1003.2(c)(1); see INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 F. App'x 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrera-mendez-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.