Herren v. State

1940 OK CR 150, 108 P.2d 195, 71 Okla. Crim. 73, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 11, 1940
DocketNo. A-9944.
StatusPublished

This text of 1940 OK CR 150 (Herren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herren v. State, 1940 OK CR 150, 108 P.2d 195, 71 Okla. Crim. 73, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147 (Okla. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, Augusta Earl Her-ren, was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession 74 pints of nontax-paid liquor with intent to violate the prohibitory liquor law, and was sentenced to 30 days’ confinement in the county jail and to pay a fine of $75 and costs.

From the judgment rendered June 8, 1940, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on October 5, 1940, petition in error with case-made.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the grounds stated in the case of Herring v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 69, 108 P. 2d 193.

A hearing was had upon said motion before the court on December 9th, at which time counsel for plaintiff in error appeared with plaintiff in error in person.

The admitted facts as shown by testimony of the plaintiff in error are the same as those in the other case.

*75 For the reasons stated therein, the appeal is hereby dismissed, in accordance with the uniform holding* of this court that where a convicted defendant appeals and gives bond to stay the execution of the sentence during the pendency of the appeal, and violates the condition of his bond by leaving the state without leave of court and is convicted of crime in another state, pending the determination of his appeal, this court will on proper motion dismiss the appeal.

Under the rule stated and the uncontroverted facts, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed and the case remanded to the trial court. Mandate forthwith.

BAREFOOT and JONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herring v. State
1940 OK CR 149 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1940 OK CR 150, 108 P.2d 195, 71 Okla. Crim. 73, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herren-v-state-oklacrimapp-1940.