Herren v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Herren v. State

380 So. 2d 372, 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1128

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 22, 1980

Docket6 Div. 199

StatusPublished

This text of 380 So. 2d 372 (Herren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herren v. State, 380 So. 2d 372, 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1128 (Ala. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner was incarcerated in Jefferson County under a $3,000 bond on an indictment for robbery. Petitioner alleged he was indigent and therefore entitled to release without bond. A hearing was held at which petitioner was represented by counsel and the petition for habeas corpus was denied. The record contains no transcript of the testimony of that hearing. Consequent[373]*373ly, this Court has nothing to review with respect to the order overruling the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Johnson v. State, 56 Ala.App. 627, 324 So.2d 341 (1975). Where an appeal is on the record proper without a transcript of the evidence, the only question presented on review is the regularity of the proceedings. Pitts v. State, 38 Ala.App. 342, 83 So.2d 258 (1955). In the absence of a showing to the contrary, the presumption is always that the trial court ruled correctly. Ballard v. State, 236 Ala. 541, 184 So. 260 (1938).

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner was incarcerated in Jefferson County under a $3,000 bond on an indictment for robbery. Petitioner alleged he was indigent and therefore entitled to release without bond. A hearing was held at which petitioner was represented by counsel and the petition for habeas corpus was denied. The record contains no transcript of the testimony of that hearing. Consequent[373]*373ly, this Court has nothing to review with respect to the order overruling the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Johnson v. State, 56 Ala.App. 627, 324 So.2d 341 (1975). Where an appeal is on the record proper without a transcript of the evidence, the only question presented on review is the regularity of the proceedings. Pitts v. State, 38 Ala.App. 342, 83 So.2d 258 (1955). In the absence of a showing to the contrary, the presumption is always that the trial court ruled correctly. Ballard v. State, 236 Ala. 541, 184 So. 260 (1938).

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

380 So. 2d 372, 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herren-v-state-alacrimapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack