Herold v. Vergari

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herold v. Vergari

61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 796 (Herold v. Vergari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herold v. Vergari, 61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in effect to compel the respondent to consent to an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal in a pending criminal prosecution, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 19, 1977, which dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLR 5511; it is his client, not he, who is the real party in interest. Were we not ordering the dismissal of this appeal, we would affirm the judgment under review on the opinion of Mr. Justice Walsh at Special Term. Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in effect to compel the respondent to consent to an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal in a pending criminal prosecution, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 19, 1977, which dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLR 5511; it is his client, not he, who is the real party in interest. Were we not ordering the dismissal of this appeal, we would affirm the judgment under review on the opinion of Mr. Justice Walsh at Special Term. Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herold-v-vergari-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack