Herold v. Frank

Supreme Court

Herold v. Frank

191 U.S. 558, 24 S. Ct. 844

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 9, 1903

DocketNo. 55

StatusPublished

This text of 191 U.S. 558 (Herold v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herold v. Frank, 191 U.S. 558, 24 S. Ct. 844 (1903).

Pincite

Opinion

In error to the Court of Errors and [559]*559Appeals of the State, of New Jersey.

Argued and submitted November 4, 1903. Decided November 9, 1903. Mr. James G, Blauvelt for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John W. Harding for defendants in error.

Per Cu-riam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Oxley Stave Company v, Butler County, 166 U. S. 648; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127; Capital City Dairy Company v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291; McKane v. Durston, 153 U. S. 684.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In error to the Court of Errors and [559]*559Appeals of the State, of New Jersey.

Argued and submitted November 4, 1903. Decided November 9, 1903. Mr. James G, Blauvelt for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John W. Harding for defendants in error.

Per Cu-riam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Oxley Stave Company v, Butler County, 166 U. S. 648; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127; Capital City Dairy Company v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291; McKane v. Durston, 153 U. S. 684.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 U.S. 558, 24 S. Ct. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herold-v-frank-scotus-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack