Herod v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herod v. International Railway Co.

269 A.D. 726, 54 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3457

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 1945·Published

Opinion

— Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to deny defendant’s [appellant’s] motion to strike out certain testimony of Dr. Goldstein. (See Cross v. City of Syracuse, 200 N. Y. 393.) All concur, Harris, J., in result only. (The judgment is in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Gravel Products Corporation, in an automobile negligence action. The order denies appellant’s motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to deny defendant’s [appellant’s] motion to strike out certain testimony of Dr. Goldstein. (See Cross v. City of Syracuse, 200 N. Y. 393.) All concur, Harris, J., in result only. (The judgment is in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Gravel Products Corporation, in an automobile negligence action. The order denies appellant’s motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Herod v. International Railway Co., 269 A.D. 726, 54 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

269 A.D. 726 (Herod v. International Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related