Herod v. International Railway Co.
This text of 269 A.D. 726 (Herod v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to deny defendant’s [appellant’s] motion to strike out certain testimony of Dr. Goldstein. (See Cross v. City of Syracuse, 200 N. Y. 393.) All concur, Harris, J., in result only. (The judgment is in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Gravel Products Corporation, in an automobile negligence action. The order denies appellant’s motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 726, 54 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herod-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1945.