Hernly v. Vogel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hernly v. Vogel

18 Misc. 2d 382, 193 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3612

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Misc. 2d 382 (Hernly v. Vogel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernly v. Vogel, 18 Misc. 2d 382, 193 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs to the defendant and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

The record discloses that the plaintiff knew or should have known that, in selling and delivering the seafood, she was dealing not with the defendant individually but with the restaurant corporation of which he was president.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI