Hernig v. Bell

Third Circuit

Hernig v. Bell

84 F.2d 1003, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4744

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1936

DocketNo. 6065

StatusPublished

This text of 84 F.2d 1003 (Hernig v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernig v. Bell, 84 F.2d 1003, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4744 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The case depends on its own unusual facts which, by reference to the opinion of the court below, (Bender Body Co. v. Quaker City Motor Truck Lines, Inc., 15 F.Supp. 401), can be seen and need not be here repeated.

The basic question is whether the court erred in holding that $1,200 in the hands of the receivers-appelj'ees was not impressed with a trust in appellant’s favor.

After argument and consideration had, we are satisfied the trial court committed no error. Any rights the appellant had in [1004]*1004such policy were not affected by the settlement made by the receivers. So holding, its decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The case depends on its own unusual facts which, by reference to the opinion of the court below, (Bender Body Co. v. Quaker City Motor Truck Lines, Inc., 15 F.Supp. 401), can be seen and need not be here repeated.

The basic question is whether the court erred in holding that $1,200 in the hands of the receivers-appelj'ees was not impressed with a trust in appellant’s favor.

After argument and consideration had, we are satisfied the trial court committed no error. Any rights the appellant had in [1004]*1004such policy were not affected by the settlement made by the receivers. So holding, its decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F.2d 1003, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernig-v-bell-ca3-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack