Herneman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Herneman v. State

1911 OK CR 353, 115 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 606, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 6, 1911

DocketNo. A-553.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 353 (Herneman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herneman v. State, 1911 OK CR 353, 115 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 606, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An information- was filed against plaintiff in error in the county court of.Oklahoma county on the 7th day of October, 1908, the same containing two counts, the first of which charges the selling of intoxicating liquor, the second, unlawful possession of such liquor with intent to sell. When the ease came on for trial on the 11th day of November, 1908, the state elected to prosecute on the first count. The plaintiff in error was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and costs and serve one hundred days in the county jail. There is a total want of evidence in the record to sustain a conviction on this count. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the county court of Oklahoma county to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An information- was filed against plaintiff in error in the county court of.Oklahoma county on the 7th day of October, 1908, the same containing two counts, the first of which charges the selling of intoxicating liquor, the second, unlawful possession of such liquor with intent to sell. When the ease came on for trial on the 11th day of November, 1908, the state elected to prosecute on the first count. The plaintiff in error was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and costs and serve one hundred days in the county jail. There is a total want of evidence in the record to sustain a conviction on this count. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the county court of Oklahoma county to grant a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 353, 115 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 606, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herneman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.