Herndon v. Ætna Insurance
This text of 107 N.C. 194 (Herndon v. Ætna Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is, in all material respects for the present purpose, like that of Herndon v. Lancashire Company, decided at this term, and must be governed by it. The defendant here is a corporation of Great Britain, in a sense a foreign subject, but this does not render unnecessary the allegation of the citizenship of the plaintiffs. Massman v. Higginson, 4 Dal., 12; Hodgson v. Benderbank, 5 Cran., 303; Damil v. Wentyman, 2 Pet , 136; Curtis v. Jones, U. S. R., 111; Steamship Company v. Tugman, 106 U. S. R., 118.
There is no error. Let this opinion be certified to the Superior Court. It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 N.C. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herndon-v-tna-insurance-nc-1890.