Herndon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Herndon v. State

1913 OK CR 354, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 654, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 330

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 25, 1913

DocketNo. A-1794.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 354 (Herndon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herndon v. State, 1913 OK CR 354, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 654, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 330 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction upon an information charging that defendant, on the 15th day of January, 1912, did have in his possession, unlawfully, -intoxicating liquors, *655 to wit, whisky, with the intent and purpose on the part of the said defendant to sell, barter, give away, and otherwise furnish, etc. On the 20th day of May, 1912, the court sentenced the defendant in accordance with the verdict of the jury to he confined in the county jail for a term of six months and that he pay a fine of five hundred dollars, íhe evidence shows that the defendant, on the date alleged, had in his possession two eases of whisky, and in proof of the payment of the special tax required of liquor dealers by the United States, the state introduced a certified copy of the records of the office of collector of internal revenue, showing that on September 28, 1911, Geo. T. Knott, collector of internal revenue, issued to L. Herndon, a retail liquor dealer’s license, at No. 24 West Main street, Oklahoma City. An examination of the record discloses the fact that the defendant had a fair and impartial trial. The judgment of the county court of Oklahoma county is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction upon an information charging that defendant, on the 15th day of January, 1912, did have in his possession, unlawfully, -intoxicating liquors, *655 to wit, whisky, with the intent and purpose on the part of the said defendant to sell, barter, give away, and otherwise furnish, etc. On the 20th day of May, 1912, the court sentenced the defendant in accordance with the verdict of the jury to he confined in the county jail for a term of six months and that he pay a fine of five hundred dollars, íhe evidence shows that the defendant, on the date alleged, had in his possession two eases of whisky, and in proof of the payment of the special tax required of liquor dealers by the United States, the state introduced a certified copy of the records of the office of collector of internal revenue, showing that on September 28, 1911, Geo. T. Knott, collector of internal revenue, issued to L. Herndon, a retail liquor dealer’s license, at No. 24 West Main street, Oklahoma City. An examination of the record discloses the fact that the defendant had a fair and impartial trial. The judgment of the county court of Oklahoma county is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 354, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 654, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herndon-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.