Herndon v. State

99 S.E. 11, 23 Ga. App. 538, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 191
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 12, 1919·No. 10221·Published

Opinion

Stepiiens, J.

Where a statute provides that it is a misdemeanor for one to “wilfully” ride or drive a horse or mule belonging to another without the owner’s consent, an. accusation charging one with “unlawfully” driving a mule of another without the owner’s consent, and failing to charge that the same was “wilfully” done, sets out no violation of the statute; nor does it charge the commission of any offense whatsoever. The trial judge therefore erred in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodmorth, J., concur. Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Jesup—Judge Clark. November 4, 1918. - ' W. -W. Bennett, for plaintiff in error, cited:

Penal Code (1910), § 333; Mathews v. State, 16 Ga. 31-3; Herring v. State, 114 Ga. 96-99.

W. B. Gibbs, solicitor, J. R. Thomas, contra, cited:

Badger v. State, 5 Ga. App. 477; Black v. State, 3 Ga. App. 397, and citations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herndon v. State, 99 S.E. 11, 23 Ga. App. 538, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 191 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

99 S.E. 11 (Herndon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Gentry
16 Ga. 31 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1854)
Herring v. State
39 S.E. 866 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Stewart v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
60 S.E. 1 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Badger v. State
63 S.E. 532 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)