Herndon v. State

1 Ga. L. Rep. 263
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herndon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 Ga. 887
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 1, 1885·Published

Opinion

Hall, J.

Newly discovered evidence, the only purpose of which is to impeach the principal witness for the State in a criminal prosecution, is not alone sufficient to require this court to overrule the discretion of the presiding judge in refusing a new trial.

(a) In such cases it would seem to be the safer course to sustain newly discovered witness by the affidavits of persons who know his character and who would testify to his uprightness. 68 Ga., 612.

(b) There is nothing in this record-which would justify an interference with the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herndon v. State, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 263 (Ga. 1885).

1 Ga. L. Rep. 263 (Herndon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanvey v. State
68 Ga. 612 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1882)