Herndon v. Sloan

Fifth Circuit

Herndon v. Sloan

231 F. 1019

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 1918

DocketNo. 2856

StatusPublished

This text of 231 F. 1019 (Herndon v. Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herndon v. Sloan, 231 F. 1019 (5th Cir. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action of trespass to try title, wherein a mass of documents, letters, reports, receipts, etc., were admitted in evidence over objections of the plaintiff in error, but to the admission of which no sufficient nor specific exceptions were taken. On the evidence admitted, the case seems to" have been fairly and clearly submitted to the jury by the trial judge, and no exception was reserved to his charge, or any portion thereof. We find no reversible error assigned, nor patent of record. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action of trespass to try title, wherein a mass of documents, letters, reports, receipts, etc., were admitted in evidence over objections of the plaintiff in error, but to the admission of which no sufficient nor specific exceptions were taken. On the evidence admitted, the case seems to" have been fairly and clearly submitted to the jury by the trial judge, and no exception was reserved to his charge, or any portion thereof. We find no reversible error assigned, nor patent of record. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 F. 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herndon-v-sloan-ca5-1918.