Herndon v. Melton

105 S.E.2d 531, 249 N.C. 217, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 443
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 19, 1958
Docket523
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 105 S.E.2d 531 (Herndon v. Melton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herndon v. Melton, 105 S.E.2d 531, 249 N.C. 217, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 443 (N.C. 1958).

Opinion

PeR CuRiam.

Upon consideration of the evidence offered by plaintiff in the light of his pleading it is clear that the alleged libelous article was written by defendant as a report of his investigation on visit to the Hong Kong Mission of the Pentecostal Holiness Church pursuant to directive of the church. Thus the rule of qualified privilege is applicable. And there being no evidence of express or actual malice, the judgment as of nonsuit is deemed proper. See Gattis v. Kilgo, 128 N.C. 402, 38 S.E. 931; s. c. 140 N.C. 106, 52 S.E. 249.

Affirmed.

PARKER, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinloch v. News & Observer Publishing Co.
314 F. Supp. 602 (E.D. North Carolina, 1969)
RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.
154 S.E.2d 344 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Wilson v. McClenny
136 S.E.2d 569 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Mertz v. Sauvageau
154 So. 2d 515 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E.2d 531, 249 N.C. 217, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herndon-v-melton-nc-1958.