Herndon v. Jones

Michigan Court of Appeals

Herndon v. Jones

164 N.W.2d 690, 13 Mich. App. 608, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1113

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 21, 1968

DocketDocket No. 3,910

StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.W.2d 690 (Herndon v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herndon v. Jones, 164 N.W.2d 690, 13 Mich. App. 608, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1113 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs filed complaint for an injunction to restrain defendants from constructing a bouse more than 50 feet from tbe front lot line in a subdivision wbicb bad a 50-foot front lot line restriction. Tbe trial judge granted defendants’ [609]*609motion for summary judgment on the basis the 50-foot restriction was a minimum restriction. Plaintiffs appeal.

Summary judgment was proper.

Affirmed but without costs.

Quinn, P. J., and Holbrook and Vandeb Wal, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs filed complaint for an injunction to restrain defendants from constructing a bouse more than 50 feet from tbe front lot line in a subdivision wbicb bad a 50-foot front lot line restriction. Tbe trial judge granted defendants’ [609]*609motion for summary judgment on the basis the 50-foot restriction was a minimum restriction. Plaintiffs appeal.

Summary judgment was proper.

Affirmed but without costs.

Quinn, P. J., and Holbrook and Vandeb Wal, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 N.W.2d 690, 13 Mich. App. 608, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herndon-v-jones-michctapp-1968.