Herndon v. Jennings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herndon v. Jennings

101 A.D.2d 688, 475 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 688 (Herndon v. Jennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herndon v. Jennings, 101 A.D.2d 688, 475 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed as against defendants Jennings. Memorandum: Defendants Jennings, owners of residential property occupied by their tenants, defendants Beeman, appeal from a judgment recovered against them by plaintiff, an eight-year-old boy, who was struck in the mouth by a baseball bat during a party given by the Beemans at which a softball game was in progress. The injury occurred when the batter, defendant Boltfield, who was allegedly intoxicated, allowed the bat to slip out of his hands. We find no breach of duty owed by defendant owners to plaintiff. There is no evidence that the accident was caused by a dangerous condition on the property (see Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233), nor is there any evidence that the owners had actual or constructive knowledge of any dangerous activities conducted on the premises by the tenants (see Mangione v Dimino, 39 AD2d 128, 129). Inasmuch as owners of property are not insurers of the safety of people on the property, there is no basis for recovery. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Seneca County, DePasquale, J. — negligente.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed as against defendants Jennings. Memorandum: Defendants Jennings, owners of residential property occupied by their tenants, defendants Beeman, appeal from a judgment recovered against them by plaintiff, an eight-year-old boy, who was struck in the mouth by a baseball bat during a party given by the Beemans at which a softball game was in progress. The injury occurred when the batter, defendant Boltfield, who was allegedly intoxicated, allowed the bat to slip out of his hands. We find no breach of duty owed by defendant owners to plaintiff. There is no evidence that the accident was caused by a dangerous condition on the property (see Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233), nor is there any evidence that the owners had actual or constructive knowledge of any dangerous activities conducted on the premises by the tenants (see Mangione v Dimino, 39 AD2d 128, 129). Inasmuch as owners of property are not insurers of the safety of people on the property, there is no basis for recovery. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Seneca County, DePasquale, J. — negligente.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 688, 475 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herndon-v-jennings-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack