Herndon v. Imperial Fire Insurance

107 N.C. 183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herndon v. Imperial Fire Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 N.C. 384
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1890·Published

Opinion

Shepherd, J.:

His Honor held “that the agreement to submit to appraisers and the award of the appraisers were not competent for any purpose, or in any way, either to support the plea of arbitrament and award, or as a binding agreement upon the parties thereto.”

The contrary was decided at the last term of this Court, in Manufacturing Company v. Assurance Company, 106 N. C., 28. In addition to the many authorities cited in that case, we will now add the recent case of Hamilton v. Insurance Company, 136 U. S., 242.

In justice to the learned Judge who tried this case, we will remark that the questions passed upon by him had not then been decided by this Court.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herndon v. Imperial Fire Insurance, 107 N.C. 183 (N.C. 1890).

107 N.C. 183 (Herndon v. Imperial Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance
136 U.S. 242 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Pioneer Manufacturing Co. v. Phœnix Assurance Co. of London
10 S.E. 1057 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)