Herndon v. Herndon

575 So. 2d 792, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2106, 1991 WL 32071
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1991·No. No. 89-0811·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Alan Herndon, appeals the trial court’s order vacating previous orders awarding paternal grandparent visitation. The trial court set aside the orders under the mistaken belief that this was mandated by Shuler v. Shuler, 371 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

We reverse because the trial court did have jurisdiction to enter the visitation orders. See Putnal v. Putnal, 392 So.2d 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). At the time of the orders, the pending action was between true contestants, the former husband and former wife. Putnal recognizes that grandparents may move for visitation under section 61.13, Florida Statutes, in a pending action, either during the dissolution proceeding or during post-dissolution proceedings.

Additionally, we note that Shuler v. Shuler, 371 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), which we deem inapposite, was decided under section 61.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). Section 61.13 has subsequently been amended. See Fla.Stat. § 61.13(2)(b)2.c (1987). In any event, Shu-ler is consistent with the subsequent amendment to section 61.13(2)(b)2.c (1987).

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herndon v. Herndon, 575 So. 2d 792, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2106, 1991 WL 32071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

575 So. 2d 792 (Herndon v. Herndon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putnal v. Putnal
392 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Shuler v. Shuler
371 So. 2d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)