Herndon v. City of McAlester

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Herndon v. City of McAlester

1913 OK CR 322, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 635, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 280

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 3, 1913

DocketNo. A-1621.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 322 (Herndon v. City of McAlester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herndon v. City of McAlester, 1913 OK CR 322, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 635, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 280 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the }Dolice court of the city of MeAlester on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, in violation of Ordinance No. 440 of said city of MeAlester. Erom the judgment of conviction he appealed to the county court of Pittsburg county, where he was again convicted, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was, on December 1, 1911, sentenced to be confined for thirty days in the city jail, and to pay to the city of MeAles-ter a fine of fifty dollars and costs. Erom the latter judgment he prosecutes this appeal. Erom a careful examination of the record we find that the charge of the court presents the law, - and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. No error being apparent, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the }Dolice court of the city of MeAlester on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, in violation of Ordinance No. 440 of said city of MeAlester. Erom the judgment of conviction he appealed to the county court of Pittsburg county, where he was again convicted, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was, on December 1, 1911, sentenced to be confined for thirty days in the city jail, and to pay to the city of MeAles-ter a fine of fifty dollars and costs. Erom the latter judgment he prosecutes this appeal. Erom a careful examination of the record we find that the charge of the court presents the law, - and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. No error being apparent, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 322, 133 P. 1196, 10 Okla. Crim. 635, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herndon-v-city-of-mcalester-oklacrimapp-1913.