Hernandez v. United States
This text of Hernandez v. United States (Hernandez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-2266 (ABJ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 6, 2012, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and
specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by August 17, 2012, the
Court may treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to
the motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the
defendant’s motion as conceded.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: September 4, 2012 /s/ AMY BERMAN JOHNSON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hernandez v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-united-states-dcd-2012.