Hernandez v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 5, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-2266·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ ) MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-2266 (ABJ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 6, 2012, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and

specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by August 17, 2012, the

Court may treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to

the motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the

defendant’s motion as conceded.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: September 4, 2012 /s/ AMY BERMAN JOHNSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. United States, (D.D.C. 2012).

Hernandez v. United States (Hernandez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.