Hernandez v. Stoffer

736 So. 2d 151, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9088, 1999 WL 454489
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 1999·No. No. 98-746·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the plaintiffs expert witness’ testimony created a conflict in the evidence, the trial court properly denied the defendants’ motions for directed verdict. See Lawrinson v. Bartruff, 600 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Further, as to the remaining points raised by the defendants, we find that they lack merit. As such, we affirm the final judgment under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. Stoffer, 736 So. 2d 151, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9088, 1999 WL 454489 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

736 So. 2d 151 (Hernandez v. Stoffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawrinson v. Bartruff
600 So. 2d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)