Hernandez v. Stoffer
736 So. 2d 151, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9088, 1999 WL 454489
This text of 736 So. 2d 151 (Hernandez v. Stoffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hernandez v. Stoffer, 736 So. 2d 151, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9088, 1999 WL 454489 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
Because the plaintiffs expert witness’ testimony created a conflict in the evidence, the trial court properly denied the defendants’ motions for directed verdict. See Lawrinson v. Bartruff, 600 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Further, as to the remaining points raised by the defendants, we find that they lack merit. As such, we affirm the final judgment under review.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lawrinson v. Bartruff
600 So. 2d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
736 So. 2d 151, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9088, 1999 WL 454489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-stoffer-fladistctapp-1999.