Hernandez v. State

450 S.W.2d 340
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1890
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 21, 1970·No. No. 42728·Published

Opinion

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 30 days and a fine of $250.00.

We are confronted with the same problem that we were confronted with in Bedell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 850 and cases there cited. See also Stuart v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 445 S.W.2d 743.

It appears from the record that the sentence was untimely and improperly pronounced. See Article 42.03, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. If, however, sentence was properly pronounced, then notice of appeal was not given within ten days thereafter as required by Article 44.08, V.A.C.C.P.

It is clear that for either reason the appeal must be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. State, 450 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1970).

450 S.W.2d 340 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bedell v. State
443 S.W.2d 850 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Stuart v. State
445 S.W.2d 743 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)