Hernandez v. State

147 S.W. 598, 66 Tex. Crim. 549, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 333
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 22, 1912·No. No. 1809.·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This appears to be an attempted appeal from a conviction for burglary. An inspection of the record does not show any verdict of the jury. The purported judgment rendered does not give the verdict nor is it anywhere else contained in the record. This being the case this court can not entertain jurisdiction.

The law provides that upon the proper motion, notice, etc., a correct judgment may be rendered nunc pro tunc, if, as a matter of fact, a verdict was correctly rendered and received by the court. Under the circumstances the case must he dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. State, 147 S.W. 598, 66 Tex. Crim. 549, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 333 (Tex. 1912).

147 S.W. 598 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.