Hernandez v. State

22 S.W. 972, 32 Tex. Crim. 271, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 262

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 14, 1893
• Docket: No. 216.
• Status: Published

Opinion

SIMKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to murder, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary, from which he appeals. There are but two questions to be considered.

1. The indictment charged an assault with intent to murder with a bowie knife. The State, over the objection of the defendant, proved that the assault and stabbing was committed with a butcher knife, and this is alleged as error. We do not think there was any variance or error. Penal Code, art. 501.

2. The court did not err in refusing the charge on drunkenness; first, because the evidence did not justify such a charge; and secondly, admitted that it did, still if appellant would have been guilty of murder had he been sober and had death resulted, the fact that he was temporarily insane from the recent use of intoxicating liquor, or so drunk as to be incapable of forming an intent, would not have reduced the offense lower than murder in the second degree. Evers’ case, 31 Texas Cr. Rep., 318. And the fact that the lowest punishment was in fact given super-cedes any failure of the court to charge that they should look to such drunkenness in mitigation of the penalty. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.