Hernandez v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hernandez v. State

813 S.W.2d 66, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 942, 1991 WL 104451

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 1991·No. No. 59014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Juan Vargas Hernandez appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the rea[67]*67sons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Juan Vargas Hernandez appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the rea[67]*67sons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hernandez v. State, 813 S.W.2d 66, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 942, 1991 WL 104451 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

813 S.W.2d 66 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.