Hernandez v. State

831 So. 2d 1249, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18267, 2002 WL 31777820
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 825 So. 2d 513
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 2002·No. No. 2D01-2334·Published

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

The public defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders1 on behalf of Felipe Hernandez in fourteen cases. Additionally, during the pendency of this appeal, the public defender filed a motion to correct sentencing errors pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), as to five of the fourteen cases, and amended sentences were properly entered in all but one of the five cases.2 The failure to enter an amended sentence in case number 00-8074 appeared to be nothing more than an oversight because the trial court granted the motion as to the challenged sentence in that particular case, but did not enter an amended sentence when the remainder of the amended sentences were rendered. In response to this court’s order for merit briefing, the State conceded that this case must be remanded for the imposition of an amended sentence on the aggravated battery count in case number 00-8074. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions, the sentences, and the amended sentences, but remand case number 00-8074 for the imposition of an amended sentence on the aggravated battery conviction.

Affirmed in part and remanded.

BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. State, 831 So. 2d 1249, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18267, 2002 WL 31777820 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

831 So. 2d 1249 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)