Hernandez v. State
638 So. 2d 209, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6257, 1994 WL 277969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 597 So. 2d 408 →
Opinion
In this Anders appeal,1 we ñnd no error occurred below and we affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we strike that part of the probation order which charges Hernandez with a Public Defender’s fee of $200.00, since he was not advised of his right to contest the fee, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720. See, e.g., Smith v. State, 632 So.2d 99 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Dujfey v. State, 629 So.2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED in part; assessment of Public Defender fees STRICKEN.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hernandez v. State, 638 So. 2d 209, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6257, 1994 WL 277969 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
638 So. 2d 209 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Smith v. State
632 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)