Hernandez v. State

543 So. 2d 755, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 265, 1989 WL 4177
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1989·No. No. 87-2701·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial upon the authority of Singletary v. State, 543 So.2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), and Carter v. State, 512 So.2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We again certify to the Florida supreme court the following question of great importance to the administration of justice:

MAY THE DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO HAVE THE TRIAL JUDGE PRESENT DURING THE VOIR DIRE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS BE VALIDLY WAIVED BY HIS ATTORNEY OR MUST THE DEFENDANT PERSONALLY WAIVE SUCH RIGHT?

REVERSED AND REMANDED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. State, 543 So. 2d 755, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 263, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 265, 1989 WL 4177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 755 (Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hernandez
552 So. 2d 911 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)