Hernandez v. State

942 S.W.2d 866, 328 Ark. 475, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 278
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 5, 1997
DocketCR 97-451
StatusPublished

This text of 942 S.W.2d 866 (Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. State, 942 S.W.2d 866, 328 Ark. 475, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 278 (Ark. 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Hilberto Hernandez, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Constance G. Grayson, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
942 S.W.2d 866, 328 Ark. 475, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-state-ark-1997.