Hernandez v. St. Barnabas Hospital
This text of 89 A.D.3d 457 (Hernandez v. St. Barnabas Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court correctly determined that this action is not [458]*458barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The prior action was dismissed as a result of plaintiffs counsel’s failure to attend a calendar call (see 22 NYCRR 202.27 [b]). Accordingly, the dismissal was not on the merits and thus does not have res judicata effect (Espinoza v Concordia Intl. Forwarding Corp., 32 AD3d 326, 328 [2006]; Kalisch v Maple Trade Fin. Corp., 35 AD3d 291 [2006]). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Saxe, Acosta, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 457, 931 N.Y.2d 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-st-barnabas-hospital-nyappdiv-2011.