Hernandez v. Simon

4 Cal. 183
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1854
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cal. 183 (Hernandez v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. Simon, 4 Cal. 183 (Cal. 1854).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

The only assignment of error we can notice is, ’the first, which objects to the description of the land as insufficient. In actions before Justices of the Peace, the same strictness is not required as in courts of record, and we see no reason to doubt that the description in this case .of the premises sued for, is sufficiently definite to enable the administration ot substantial justice. It has also been well urged, that in many of these cases where force and threats are complained of, it may be impossible for the injured party to obtain a more accurate description, which could only be done by a regular survey, from which he may be intimidated by fear of violence.

The other assignments of error are not well taken, as they depend on a bill of exceptions, or statement of the case, which was filed ex parte, and has no verity. It is no part of the record, and should not have been set up.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cal. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-simon-cal-1854.