Hernandez v. Riley

821 So. 2d 456, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10239, 2002 WL 1610077
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2002·No. No. 1D01-3710·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, we affirm as to all issues except that by which the former wife complains that the trial court should have awarded attorney fees to her. Al[457] though, in denying the former wife’s request for attorney fees the trial court found “that both parties are leaving the marriage in essentially the same position in terms of assets, and that there is no disparity in their relative financial circumstances,” we are unable to assess the correctness of that finding because the trial court made no finding regarding the parties’ respective incomes. Accordingly, we reverse as to the attorney fee issue only. On remand, the trial court is directed to make findings regarding the parties’ respective incomes and other financial matters, sufficient to permit intelligent review of its decision regarding the former wife’s request for attorney fees. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. Riley, 821 So. 2d 456, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10239, 2002 WL 1610077 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

821 So. 2d 456 (Hernandez v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLillo v. DeLillo
848 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)