Hernandez v. Quiros

CourtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut
DecidedApril 24, 2024
Docket3:24-cv-00425
StatusUnknown

This text of Hernandez v. Quiros (Hernandez v. Quiros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. Quiros, (D. Conn. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

RAFAEL HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, No. 3:24-cv-425 (SRU)

v.

ANGEL QUIROS, et al., Defendant.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

The plaintiff, Rafael Hernandez, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this civil rights action. Docs. No. 2, 13, 17. For the reasons that follow, Hernandez’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. The decision to allow an individual to proceed in forma pauperis in civil cases is committed to the sound discretion of the district court. Monti v. McKeon, 600 F. Supp. 112, 113 (D. Conn. 1984), aff’d, 788 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1985). In exercising that discretion, the district court must determine whether the burden of paying the fees for filing and service would either hamper the plaintiff’s ability to obtain the necessities of life or force him to abandon the action. Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948); Potnick v. Easter State Hosp., 701 F.2d 243, 244 (2d Cir. 1983). The copy of Hernandez’s inmate trust account statement shows that he has a spendable balance of $2,136.07 and during the past six months has received deposits totaling over $1,500.00. Doc. No. 13 at 7-9. Hernandez states that he supports no dependents and spends about $150.00 per month in the commissary. He therefore has sufficient funds to pay the filing fee in this case. Hernandez’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis, docs. no. 2, 13, 17, are denied. The complaint will be deemed received by the court on March 22, 2024, so long as the filing fee is submitted within the time allotted by this order. All further proceedings in the matter shall be held in abeyance for twenty-one (21) days pending Hernandez’s delivery of the filing fee in the

amount of $405.00 (money order or bank check made payable to the Clerk of Court) to the Clerk’s Office, 915 Lafayette Blvd., Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06604. If Hernandez fails to submit the filing fee within twenty-one days of this Order, his case will be dismissed without prejudice to refiling once he is able to pay the fee. So ordered. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 24th day of April 2024.

/s/ STEFAN R. UNDERHILL Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
335 U.S. 331 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Monti v. McKeon
600 F. Supp. 112 (D. Connecticut, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hernandez v. Quiros, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-quiros-ctd-2024.