Hernandez v. New York
498 U.S. 894, 111 S. Ct. 242
This text of 498 U.S. 894 (Hernandez v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hernandez v. New York, 498 U.S. 894, 111 S. Ct. 242 (1990).
Opinion
Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions:
“1. Whether a prosecutor’s proffered explanation that prospective Latino jurors were struck from the venire because he suspected they might not abide by official translations of Spanish language testimony constitutes an acceptable ‘race neutral’ explanation under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (1986)?
“2. Where a trial court has accepted the prosecutor’s proffered explanation as being race neutral, what standard of review is to be applied by reviewing courts?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
498 U.S. 894, 111 S. Ct. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-new-york-scotus-1990.