Hernandez v. Miami-Dade County

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 30, 2018
Docket17-1364
StatusPublished

This text of Hernandez v. Miami-Dade County (Hernandez v. Miami-Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. Miami-Dade County, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 30, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-1364 Lower Tribunal Nos. 15-0198, 01-14-0002-2344 ________________

Moises Hernandez, Petitioner,

vs.

Miami-Dade County, Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate Division, Eric William Hendon, Antonio Marin, and Thomas Rebull, Judges.

Law Office of Leslie Holland, and Leslie Holland, for petitioner.

Abigail Price-Williams, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and William X. Candela, Assistant County Attorney, for respondent.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LAGOA, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Moises Hernandez, brought this case as an appeal from the circuit

court appellate division’s per curiam affirmance of the Miami-Dade County

Mayor’s decision dismissing Petitioner from his employment with the County

based on the findings and recommendations of a hearing officer following a civil

service hearing conducted pursuant to Section 2-47 of the Miami-Dade County

Code. We treat the appeal as a petition for second-tier certiorari review. See Fla.

R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B).

As such, we are limited to a determination of whether Petitioner has

demonstrated a violation of a clearly established legal principle that resulted in a

miscarriage of justice. See Miami-Dade Cty v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc., 863 So.

2d 195, 199 (Fla. 2003). In considering the evidence in the record, we find he has

not and, therefore, deny the petition.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miami-Dade County v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc.
863 So. 2d 195 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hernandez v. Miami-Dade County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-miami-dade-county-fladistctapp-2018.