Hernandez v. McGinnis

251 A.D.2d 769, 674 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6767
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 11, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 769 (Hernandez v. McGinnis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. McGinnis, 251 A.D.2d 769, 674 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The positive results of two urinalysis tests indicating the presence of marihuana, together with the misbehavior report and the testimony presented at the disciplinary hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner, a prison inmate, guilty of using a controlled substance in violation of a prison disciplinary rule (see, Matter of Bonilla v Coombe, 221 AD2d 782, lv denied 87 NY2d 807). Although petitioner was taking medication at the time of the urinalysis test, both a correction officer who conducted one of the urinalysis tests and a nurse at the correction facility testified that the medication would not have caused a false positive for marihuana. Furthermore, we reject petitioner’s contention that respondents failed to comply with the relevant regulations governing urinalysis testing procedures or failed to conduct the appropriate inquiries. Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and are either without merit or not properly before this Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hilts v. Selsky
303 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Rivera v. Goord
276 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Martinez v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
273 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Aviles v. Selsky
264 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 769, 674 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-mcginnis-nyappdiv-1998.